On x86, cpu_info lives at the top of stack. Make the arm do that as
well, as the threading model needs that and so will multicore support.
As part of this change, make the stack size a power of 2.
Also make it much smaller -- 2048 bytes is PLENTY for ram stage.
Note that the small stack size is counterintuitive for rom stage. How
can this work in rom stage, which needs a HUGE stack for lzma? The
main use of STACK_SIZE has always been in ram stage; since 2002 or so
it was to size per-core stacks (see, e.g.,
src/arch/x86/lib/c_start.S:.space CONFIG_MAX_CPUS*CONFIG_STACK_SIZE
and, more recently, thread stacks. So, we define the STACK_TOP for rom
and ram stage, but the STACK_SIZE has no real effect on the ROM stage
(no hardware red zones on the stack) and hence we're ok with actually
defining the "wrong" stack size. In fact, the coreboot_ram ldscript
for armv7 sizes the stack by subtracting CONFIG_STACK_BOTTOM from
CONFIG_STACK_TOP, so we replicate that arithmetic in bootblock.inc
Observed stack usage in ramstage:
BS: BS_PAYLOAD_LOAD times (us): entry 1 run 153887 exit 1
Jumping to boot code at 23104044
CPU0: stack: 02072800 - 02073000, lowest used address 020728d4, stack used: 1836 bytes
entry = 23104044
Which means we do need 2K, not 1K.
BUG=None
TEST=Build and boot and verify that cpu_info returns a correct value
BRANCH=None
Change-Id: I1a21db87081597efe463095bfd33c89eba1d569f
Signed-off-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.chromium.org/gerrit/66135
Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@chromium.org>
Tested-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@chromium.org>
f011097e9f