Otherwise there's no good way to create an absolute timer structure without
fiddling with its internal structure or assuming a zero initialized structure
has a value of zero.
Old-Change-Id: Iffe3b6b25ed7963fcfb66f749c531ea445ea4aeb
Signed-off-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.chromium.org/gerrit/65301
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Stefan Reinauer <reinauer@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <reinauer@google.com>
Tested-by: Stefan Reinauer <reinauer@google.com>
(cherry picked from commit e2e5c1ef3b)
exynos: Simplify the monotonic timer implementation.
The previous implementation was overly complicated, and when used in the
timestamp implementation produced some weird and broken results.
Old-Change-Id: I3048028ddea0657b01b0c94f312764b38d1397e4
Signed-off-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.chromium.org/gerrit/65302
Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Stefan Reinauer <reinauer@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <reinauer@google.com>
Tested-by: Stefan Reinauer <reinauer@google.com>
(cherry picked from commit 6a3fde9a5b)
Squashed two closely related commits.
Change-Id: Ifc32d773f4f93d34275a81781001d080357fe8ef
Signed-off-by: Isaac Christensen <isaac.christensen@se-eng.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/6406
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Edward O'Callaghan <eocallaghan@alterapraxis.com>
6ccc45d7d5