When looking into possible reasons for a proposed revert [1], I noticed
that the comments use four arguments for `PCIE_DDI_DATA_INITIALIZER`,
but the actual definition only uses three.
$ git grep -A1 PCIE_DDI_DATA_INITIALIZER # manually squeeze whitespace in output
[…]
--
src/vendorcode/amd/agesa/f10/AGESA.h:#define PCIE_DDI_DATA_INITIALIZER(mConnectorType, mAuxIndex, mHpdIndex ) \
src/vendorcode/amd/agesa/f10/AGESA.h-{mConnectorType, mAuxIndex, mHpdIndex}
--
src/vendorcode/amd/agesa/f10/AGESA.h: * PCIE_DDI_DATA_INITIALIZER (ConnectorType
src/vendorcode/amd/agesa/f10/AGESA.h- * },
--
src/vendorcode/amd/agesa/f10/AGESA.h: * PCIE_DDI_DATA_INITIALIZER (ConnectorType
src/vendorcode/amd/agesa/f10/AGESA.h- * }
--
[…]
So remove the fourth argument in the comments. Luckily the compiler,
at least gcc, warns about a wrong number of arguments, and therefore
no incorrect code resulted from the wrong documentation.
[1] http://review.coreboot.org/#/c/3077/
Change-Id: I3e5a02c66a23af1eb2d86be8dbc7aaa3e5cea05e
Signed-off-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/3080
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
07e0f1bf1a