erebion/coreboot
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions

lib/ramtest: Fix ram_check() declarations

Browse source 
For a long time, second parameter 'stop' has been
ignored. The tested range is within 1 MiB above 'start'.

Change-Id: Icbf94cd6a651fbf0cd9aab97eb11f9b03f0c3c31
Signed-off-by: Kyösti Mälkki <kyosti.malkki@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/48561
Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
This commit is contained in:
Kyösti Mälkki 2019-03-23 10:00:31 +02:00 • committed by Patrick Georgi
commit e1aa9833c1
3 changed files with 8 additions and 8 deletions
Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

8
src/lib/ramtest.c
View file

@ -67,7 +67,7 @@ static inline void test_pattern(unsigned short int idx,
*
* @param start System memory offset, aligned to 128bytes
*/
static int ram_bitset_nodie(unsigned long start)
static int ram_bitset_nodie(uintptr_t start)
{
unsigned long addr, value, value2;
unsigned short int idx;
@ -117,7 +117,7 @@ static int ram_bitset_nodie(unsigned long start)
}
void ram_check(unsigned long start, unsigned long stop)
void ram_check(uintptr_t start)
{
/*
* This is much more of a "Is my DRAM properly configured?"
@ -131,7 +131,7 @@ void ram_check(unsigned long start, unsigned long stop)
}
int ram_check_nodie(unsigned long start, unsigned long stop)
int ram_check_nodie(uintptr_t start)
{
int ret;
/*
@ -146,7 +146,7 @@ int ram_check_nodie(unsigned long start, unsigned long stop)
return ret;
}
int ram_check_noprint_nodie(unsigned long start, unsigned long stop)
int ram_check_noprint_nodie(uintptr_t start)
{
unsigned long addr, value, value2;
unsigned short int idx;