erebion/coreboot
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions

fix up initialisation. can an IBM person please take this back to IBM

Browse source 
and see if the -O lb produces structs that are in the least sensible? 
signed-off-by: Ronald G. minnich


git-svn-id: svn://coreboot.org/repository/LinuxBIOSv3@30 f3766cd6-281f-0410-b1cd-43a5c92072e9
This commit is contained in:
Ronald G. Minnich 2006-10-19 23:17:43 +00:00
commit 0cfd87938b
2 changed files with 5 additions and 5 deletions
Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

2
util/dtc/dtc.h
View file

@ -101,7 +101,7 @@ struct fixup {
struct data {
int len;
char *val;
unsigned char *val;
int asize;
struct fixup *refs;
};

8
util/dtc/flattree.c
View file

@ -413,7 +413,7 @@ static void linuxbios_emit_data(void *e, struct property *p)
return;
cleanname = clean(p->name, 1);
fprintf(f, "\tu8 %s = {", cleanname);
fprintf(f, "\t.%s = {", cleanname);
free(cleanname);
for(i = 0; i < d.len; i++)
@ -539,13 +539,13 @@ static void flatten_tree_emit_structdecls(struct node *tree, struct emitter *emi
if (streq(prop->name, "name"))
seen_name_prop = 1;
cleanname = clean(prop->name, 0);
fprintf(f, "\tu32 %s;\n", cleanname);
fprintf(f, "\tu8 %s[%d];\n", prop->name, prop->val.len);
free(cleanname);
}
#if 0
if ((vi->flags & FTF_NAMEPROPS) && !seen_name_prop) {
fprintf(f, "\tu32 %s\n", prop->name);
fprintf(f, "\tu8 %s[%d];\n", prop->name, prop->val.len);
}
#endif
emit->endnode(etarget, treename);
@ -590,7 +590,7 @@ static void flatten_tree_emit_structinits(struct node *tree, struct emitter *emi
}
#if 0
if ((vi->flags & FTF_NAMEPROPS) && !seen_name_prop) {
fprintf(f, "\tu32 %s\n", prop->name);
fprintf(f, "\tu8 %s[%d]\n", prop->name, prop->data.len);
}
#endif